Apple A18 Pro vs Samsung Exynos 2600
70.5CPU72.6
53.5GPU77.4
69Benchmarks81.1
72AIspec-based—
79.6Efficiencyspec-based100
1 spec wins — Apple A18 Pro5 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2600
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2600 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 80.4 to 67.5, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+24) and benchmarks (+12). Apple A18 Pro still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A18 Pro
- 14% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 3,400 vs 2,995
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600
- Stronger GPU score: 77 vs 54
- Stronger benchmarks score: 81 vs 69
- 68% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 7,230 vs 4,300
- 67% higher cores: 10 vs 6
- 33% lower process: 2 nm vs 3 nm
General
| Spec | Apple A18 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2026 |
| Process | 3 nm | 2 nm+33% |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv9.3 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A18 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 10+67% |
| Core configuration | 2x4.05 GHz + 4x2.42 GHz | 1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency) |
| Max clock | 4.05 GHz | — |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A18 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (6-core) | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A18 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 35 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A18 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X-7500 | — |
| Max bandwidth | 60 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A18 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X75) | — |
Media
| Spec | Apple A18 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@120fps | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A18 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 1,750,000 | 2,827,538Top 12% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 947,776Top 9% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 1,052,625Top 12% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 347,409Top 23% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 479,728Top 25% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 3,400+14%Top 6% | 2,995Top 9% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,400Top 10% | 10,824+29%Top 5% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 4,300Top 21% | 7,230+68%Top 7% |
Related comparisons
Apple A18 Provs Apple A18VSApple A18 Provs Google Tensor G6VSApple A18 Provs Samsung Exynos 2500VSApple A18 Provs Apple A19VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5VS

