Google Tensor vs Huawei Kirin T92B
34.9CPU40.3
36.9GPU30.3
54.4Benchmarks61.9
58.3Efficiencyspec-based—
1 spec wins — Google Tensor4 spec wins — Huawei Kirin T92B
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: Google Tensor scores 43.7 against 42.7 for Huawei Kirin T92B. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Google Tensor edges ahead in GPU, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor
- Stronger GPU score: 37 vs 30
- 30% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 1,899 vs 1,459
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin T92B
- Stronger CPU score: 40 vs 35
- Stronger benchmarks score: 62 vs 54
- 57% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 4,932 vs 3,150
- 36% higher AnTuTu 12: 1,514,763 vs 1,115,740
- 13% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,516 vs 1,340
General
| Spec | Google Tensor | Huawei Kirin T92B |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021 | 2025 |
| Process | 5 nm | — |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | — |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor | Huawei Kirin T92B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-X1 + 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | — |
| Max clock | 2.8 GHz | — |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor | Huawei Kirin T92B |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G78 MP20 | HiSilicon Maleoon 920 |
| GPU clock | 848 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor | Huawei Kirin T92B |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor | Huawei Kirin T92B |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor | Huawei Kirin T92B |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Samsung Exynos 5123) | — |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor | Huawei Kirin T92B |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor | Huawei Kirin T92B |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | — | 1,321,202Top 43% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 490,941Top 37% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 208,024Top 47% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 316,890Top 24% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 305,347Top 45% |
| AnTuTu 12 | 1,115,740Bottom 47% | 1,514,763+36%Top 38% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,340Top 33% | 1,516+13%Top 28% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,150Top 45% | 4,932+57%Top 22% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,899+30%Top 27% | 1,459Top 34% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensorvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4VSGoogle Tensorvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3VSGoogle Tensorvs Samsung Exynos 1480VSGoogle Tensorvs Samsung Exynos 2100VSHuawei Kirin T92Bvs Samsung Exynos 1480VSHuawei Kirin T92Bvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4VSHuawei Kirin T92Bvs Huawei Kirin 9030SVSHuawei Kirin T92Bvs MediaTek Dimensity 7300VS