Google Tensor vs Samsung Exynos 2100
34.9CPU37.1
36.9GPU35.8
54.4Benchmarks47.5
—AIspec-based64
58.3Efficiencyspec-based55.9
3 spec wins — Google Tensor4 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2100
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: Google Tensor scores 43.7 against 44.4 for Samsung Exynos 2100. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Samsung Exynos 2100 edges ahead in CPU, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor
- Stronger benchmarks score: 54 vs 48
- 22% higher AnTuTu 12: 1,115,740 vs 915,363
- 11% lower TDP (typical): 8 W vs 9 W
- 10% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 1,899 vs 1,733
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2100
- 13% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 3,550 vs 3,150
General
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021 | 2021 |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W+11% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-X1 + 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1 + 3x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2.8 GHz | 2.9 GHz+4% |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G78 MP20 | Arm Mali-G78 MP14 |
| GPU clock | 848 MHz | 854 MHz+1% |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 26 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Samsung Exynos 5123) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | — | 746,547Bottom 24% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 252,025Bottom 18% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 127,819Bottom 32% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 144,909Bottom 21% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 221,794Bottom 32% |
| AnTuTu 12 | 1,115,740+22%Bottom 47% | 915,363Bottom 35% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,340Top 33% | 1,430+7%Top 31% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,150Top 45% | 3,550+13%Top 39% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,899+10%Top 27% | 1,733Top 31% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensorvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4VSGoogle Tensorvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3VSGoogle Tensorvs Samsung Exynos 1480VSGoogle Tensorvs Huawei Kirin T92BVSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Huawei Kirin T93 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Samsung Exynos 1480VS

