Huawei Kirin 8000 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
30.7CPU51.7
—GPU49.4
—Benchmarks71.2
20Efficiencyspec-based66.5
0 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 80003 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Huawei Kirin 8000 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 8000
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger CPU score: 52 vs 31
- 43% lower process: 4 nm vs 7 nm
- 33% higher Max clock: 3.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
- 25% higher cores: 10 vs 8
General
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2023 |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm+43% |
| TDP (typical) | — | 9 W |
| Architecture | — | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x2.4 GHz + 3x2.19 GHz + 4x1.84 GHz | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz+33% |
GPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | — | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
AI
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | — | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | — | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | — | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 8000 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | — | 1,914,857Top 34% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 637,914Top 31% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 562,338Top 34% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 289,405Top 43% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 425,200Top 34% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 2,150Top 17% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 6,600Top 16% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 3,800Top 23% |
Related comparisons
Huawei Kirin 8000vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3VSHuawei Kirin 8000vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300VSHuawei Kirin 8000vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3VSHuawei Kirin 8000vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8500VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VS