Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin 8000 vs Samsung Exynos 2600

H
—Inno Score
VS
Samsung Exynos 2600
80.4Inno Score
30.7CPU72.6
—GPU77.4
—Benchmarks81.1
20Efficiencyspec-based100
0 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 80003 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2600

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Huawei Kirin 8000 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 8000

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600

  • Stronger CPU score: 73 vs 31
  • 71% lower process: 2 nm vs 7 nm
  • 25% higher cores: 10 vs 8

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000Samsung Exynos 2600
Announced20232026
Process7 nm2 nm+71%
Architecture—Armv9.3

CPU

CPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000Samsung Exynos 2600
Cores810+25%
Core configuration1x2.4 GHz + 3x2.19 GHz + 4x1.84 GHz1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency)
Max clock2.4 GHz—

GPU

GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000Samsung Exynos 2600
GPU—Samsung Xclipse 960

AI

AI comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000Samsung Exynos 2600
NPU—Samsung NPU

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Huawei Kirin 8000 versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecHuawei Kirin 8000Samsung Exynos 2600
AnTuTu—2,827,538Top 12%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—947,776Top 8%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—1,052,625Top 12%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—347,409Top 22%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—479,728Top 27%
Geekbench 6 (single)—2,995Top 8%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—10,824Top 5%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—7,230Top 7%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup