Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin T92A vs Unisoc T9300

Huawei Kirin T92A
37.8Inno Score
VS
Unisoc T9300
—Inno Score
40CPU30.7
28GPU80
60Benchmarks—
20Efficiencyspec-based36
0 spec wins — Huawei Kirin T92A1 spec wins — Unisoc T9300

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Unisoc T9300 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin T92A

  • Stronger CPU score: 40 vs 31

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T9300

  • Stronger GPU score: 80 vs 28
  • 14% lower process: 6 nm vs 7 nm

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin T92A versus Unisoc T9300
SpecHuawei Kirin T92AUnisoc T9300
Announced20252025
Process7 nm6 nm+14%
Architecture—Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Huawei Kirin T92A versus Unisoc T9300
SpecHuawei Kirin T92AUnisoc T9300
Cores88
Core configuration—2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6x2.2 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock—2.4 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin T92A versus Unisoc T9300
SpecHuawei Kirin T92AUnisoc T9300
GPUHiSilicon Maleoon 920Arm Mali-G57 MC2
GPU clock—1,100 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Huawei Kirin T92A versus Unisoc T9300
SpecHuawei Kirin T92AUnisoc T9300
Memory type—LPDDR4X-2133

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Huawei Kirin T92A versus Unisoc T9300
SpecHuawei Kirin T92AUnisoc T9300
Modem—Integrated 5G NR (Release 17) SA/NSA, LTE Cat-13
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6 (optional)
Bluetooth5.25.4

Media

Media comparison: Huawei Kirin T92A versus Unisoc T9300
SpecHuawei Kirin T92AUnisoc T9300
Max display—FHD+ @ 144Hz
Video capture—2K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Huawei Kirin T92A versus Unisoc T9300
SpecHuawei Kirin T92AUnisoc T9300
AnTuTu1,225,220Top 48%—
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)474,825Top 39%—
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)205,592Top 48%—
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)276,082Top 37%—
AnTuTu 11 (UX)268,721Bottom 50%—
Geekbench 6 (single)1,517Top 26%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)4,812Top 22%—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,184Bottom 46%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup