Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin T92B vs Unisoc T9300

Huawei Kirin T92B
42.7Inno Score
VS
Unisoc T9300
—Inno Score
40.3CPU28
30.3GPU80
61.9Benchmarks—
—Efficiencyspec-based36
2 spec wins — Huawei Kirin T92B0 spec wins — Unisoc T9300

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Unisoc T9300 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin T92B

  • Stronger CPU score: 40 vs 28
  • 110% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 4,932 vs 2,354
  • 54% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,516 vs 985

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T9300

  • Stronger GPU score: 80 vs 30

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin T92B versus Unisoc T9300
SpecHuawei Kirin T92BUnisoc T9300
Announced20252025
Process—6 nm
Architecture—Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Huawei Kirin T92B versus Unisoc T9300
SpecHuawei Kirin T92BUnisoc T9300
Cores88
Core configuration—2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6x2.2 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock—2.4 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin T92B versus Unisoc T9300
SpecHuawei Kirin T92BUnisoc T9300
GPUHiSilicon Maleoon 920Arm Mali-G57 MC2
GPU clock—1,100 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Huawei Kirin T92B versus Unisoc T9300
SpecHuawei Kirin T92BUnisoc T9300
Memory type—LPDDR4X-2133

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Huawei Kirin T92B versus Unisoc T9300
SpecHuawei Kirin T92BUnisoc T9300
Modem—Integrated 5G NR (Release 17) SA/NSA, LTE Cat-13
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6 (optional)
Bluetooth5.25.4

Media

Media comparison: Huawei Kirin T92B versus Unisoc T9300
SpecHuawei Kirin T92BUnisoc T9300
Max display—FHD+ @ 144Hz
Video capture—2K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Huawei Kirin T92B versus Unisoc T9300
SpecHuawei Kirin T92BUnisoc T9300
AnTuTu1,321,202Top 43%—
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)490,941Top 37%—
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)208,024Top 47%—
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)316,890Top 24%—
AnTuTu 11 (UX)305,347Top 45%—
AnTuTu 121,514,763Top 38%—
Geekbench 6 (single)1,516+54%Top 28%985Bottom 44%
Geekbench 6 (multi)4,932+110%Top 22%2,354Bottom 42%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,459Top 34%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup