Skip to content
InnoReviews

MediaTek Helio G200 vs Unisoc T9300

MediaTek Helio G200
37.2Inno Score
VS
Unisoc T9300
—Inno Score
25.6CPU30.7
—GPU80
41.3Benchmarks—
54.9Efficiencyspec-based36
0 spec wins — MediaTek Helio G2000 spec wins — Unisoc T9300

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Unisoc T9300 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the MediaTek Helio G200

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T9300

  • Stronger CPU score: 31 vs 26

General

General comparison: MediaTek Helio G200 versus Unisoc T9300
SpecMediaTek Helio G200Unisoc T9300
Announced20252025
Process6 nm6 nm
TDP (typical)5 W—
ArchitectureArmv8.2Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: MediaTek Helio G200 versus Unisoc T9300
SpecMediaTek Helio G200Unisoc T9300
Cores88
Core configuration2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A552x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6x2.2 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.4 GHz2.4 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: MediaTek Helio G200 versus Unisoc T9300
SpecMediaTek Helio G200Unisoc T9300
GPUArm Mali-G57 MC2Arm Mali-G57 MC2
GPU clock—1,100 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: MediaTek Helio G200 versus Unisoc T9300
SpecMediaTek Helio G200Unisoc T9300
Memory typeLPDDR4X-2133LPDDR4X-2133
Max bandwidth17.1 GB/s—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: MediaTek Helio G200 versus Unisoc T9300
SpecMediaTek Helio G200Unisoc T9300
ModemIntegrated LTE Cat-13Integrated 5G NR (Release 17) SA/NSA, LTE Cat-13
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6 (optional)
Bluetooth5.45.4

Media

Media comparison: MediaTek Helio G200 versus Unisoc T9300
SpecMediaTek Helio G200Unisoc T9300
Max displayFHD+ @ 144HzFHD+ @ 144Hz
Video capture2K@30fps2K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: MediaTek Helio G200 versus Unisoc T9300
SpecMediaTek Helio G200Unisoc T9300
AnTuTu581,818Bottom 13%—
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)212,630Bottom 12%—
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)47,609Bottom 15%—
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)152,829Bottom 29%—
AnTuTu 11 (UX)168,750Bottom 12%—
Geekbench 6 (single)760Bottom 31%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)2,100Bottom 36%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup