Skip to content
InnoReviews

MediaTek Dimensity 6360 vs Unisoc T8200

MediaTek Dimensity 6360
26.3Inno Score
VS
Unisoc T8200
—Inno Score
25.4CPU28
21.5GPU55
36Efficiencyspec-based36
2 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 63600 spec wins — Unisoc T8200

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Unisoc T8200 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 6360

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T8200

  • Stronger GPU score: 55 vs 22

General

General comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 6360 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 6360Unisoc T8200
Announced20262025
Process6 nm6 nm
ArchitectureArmv8.2Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 6360 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 6360Unisoc T8200
Cores88
Core configuration2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A552x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.4 GHz+4%2.3 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 6360 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 6360Unisoc T8200
GPUArm Mali-G57 MC2Arm Mali-G57 MC2
GPU clock—850 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 6360 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 6360Unisoc T8200
Memory typeLPDDR4X-4266LPDDR4X-2133

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 6360 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 6360Unisoc T8200
ModemIntegrated 5G modem (3GPP Release 16)Integrated 5G (SA/NSA)
Max download3.3 Gbps—
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6 (1x1, optional)
Bluetooth5.25.4

Media

Media comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 6360 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 6360Unisoc T8200
Max displayFHD+ @ 120HzFHD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture—4K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 6360 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 6360Unisoc T8200
Geekbench 6 (single)769Bottom 32%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)1,978Bottom 29%—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme378Bottom 9%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup