MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ vs Samsung Exynos 2600
66.2CPU72.6
69.8GPU77.4
80.7Benchmarks81.1
77.2Efficiencyspec-based100
2 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 9400+9 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2600
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2600 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 80.4 to 72.3, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+8) and CPU (+6). MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+
- 33% higher AnTuTu 11 (UX): 636,631 vs 479,728
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600
- Stronger CPU score: 73 vs 66
- Stronger GPU score: 77 vs 70
- 33% lower process: 2 nm vs 3 nm
- 25% higher cores: 10 vs 8
- 20% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,824 vs 9,000
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2026 |
| Process | 3 nm | 2 nm+33% |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv9.3 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x3.73 GHz Cortex-X925 + 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 + 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720 | 1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency) |
| Max clock | 3.73 GHz | — |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Immortalis-G925 MC12 | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek NPU 890 | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X-10667 | — |
| Max bandwidth | 85.3 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G-A modem | — |
| Max download | 7 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | WQHD+ @ 180Hz | — |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 11 | 2,784,235Top 14% | 2,827,538+2%Top 12% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 829,825Top 14% | 947,776+14%Top 9% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 946,941Top 14% | 1,052,625+11%Top 12% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 370,838+7%Top 9% | 347,409Top 23% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 636,631+33%Top 9% | 479,728Top 25% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,900Top 10% | 2,995+3%Top 9% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 9,000Top 7% | 10,824+20%Top 4% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 6,300Top 9% | 7,230+15%Top 7% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 9400+vs Apple A19 ProVSMediaTek Dimensity 9400+vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5VSMediaTek Dimensity 9400+vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400VSMediaTek Dimensity 9400+vs Apple A19VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5VS