MediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs Samsung Exynos 2600
60.2CPU72.6
68.8GPU77.4
79.4Benchmarks81.1
77.2Efficiencyspec-based100
0 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 94006 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2600
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2600 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 80.4 to 69.7, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+12) and GPU (+9). MediaTek Dimensity 9400 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 9400
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600
- Stronger CPU score: 73 vs 60
- Stronger GPU score: 77 vs 69
- 34% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,824 vs 8,068
- 33% lower process: 2 nm vs 3 nm
- 25% higher cores: 10 vs 8
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2026 |
| Process | 3 nm | 2 nm+33% |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv9.3 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x3.62 GHz Cortex-X925 + 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 + 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720 | 1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency) |
| Max clock | 3.62 GHz | — |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Immortalis-G925 MC12 | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek NPU 890 | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X-10667 | — |
| Max bandwidth | 85.3 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G-A modem | — |
| Max download | 7 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | WQHD+ @ 180Hz | — |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 2,650,000 | 2,827,538Top 8% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 947,776Top 5% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 1,052,625Top 8% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 347,409Top 15% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 479,728Top 24% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,493Top 11% | 2,995+20%Top 7% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,068Top 10% | 10,824+34%Top 4% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 6,173Top 8% | 7,230+17%Top 5% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 9400vs Apple A18 ProVSMediaTek Dimensity 9400vs Apple A19VSMediaTek Dimensity 9400vs Samsung Exynos 2500VSMediaTek Dimensity 9400vs Apple A18VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Xiaomi Xring O3VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteVS

