Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Exynos 1610 vs Unisoc Tiger T760

WINNER
Samsung Exynos 1610
30.5Inno Score
VS
Unisoc Tiger T760
30.1Inno Score
27.3CPU24.6
21.5GPU22
52Efficiencyspec-based54.9
4 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 16102 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T760

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: Samsung Exynos 1610 scores 30.5 against 30.1 for Unisoc Tiger T760. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Samsung Exynos 1610 edges ahead in CPU, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1610

  • 29% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 953 vs 738
  • 17% lower process: 5 nm vs 6 nm

Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T760

  • 15% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 443 vs 384

General

General comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc Tiger T760
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc Tiger T760
Announced20262022
Process5 nm+17%6 nm
TDP (typical)—5 W
Architecture—Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc Tiger T760
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc Tiger T760
Cores88
Core configuration2 + 64x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.4 GHz+9%2.2 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc Tiger T760
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc Tiger T760
GPUMali-G68Arm Mali-G57 MP4

Memory

Memory comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc Tiger T760
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc Tiger T760
Memory typeLPDDR4XLPDDR4X-2133
Max bandwidth—17.1 GB/s

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc Tiger T760
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc Tiger T760
Modem4G LTEIntegrated 5G (sub-6)
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.35.2

Media

Media comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc Tiger T760
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc Tiger T760
Max display—FHD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture4K@60fps4K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc Tiger T760
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc Tiger T760
Geekbench 6 (single)953+29%Bottom 40%738Bottom 29%
Geekbench 6 (multi)2,144Bottom 36%2,168+1%Bottom 37%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme384Bottom 34%443+15%Bottom 37%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup