Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Exynos 1610 vs Unisoc Tiger T760

S
—Inno Score
VS
Unisoc Tiger T760
33.4Inno Score
30.7CPU22.8
—Benchmarks33.1
—Efficiencyspec-based54.9
2 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 16100 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T760

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 1610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1610

  • Stronger CPU score: 31 vs 23

Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T760

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

General

General comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc Tiger T760
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc Tiger T760
Announced20262022
Process—6 nm
TDP (typical)—5 W
Architecture—Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc Tiger T760
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc Tiger T760
Cores88
Core configuration2 + 64x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.4 GHz+9%2.2 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc Tiger T760
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc Tiger T760
GPUMali-G68Arm Mali-G57 MP4

Memory

Memory comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc Tiger T760
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc Tiger T760
Memory type—LPDDR4X-2133
Max bandwidth—17.1 GB/s

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc Tiger T760
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc Tiger T760
Modem—Integrated 5G (sub-6)
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.35.2

Media

Media comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc Tiger T760
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc Tiger T760
Max display—FHD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture—4K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Samsung Exynos 1610 versus Unisoc Tiger T760
SpecSamsung Exynos 1610Unisoc Tiger T760
AnTuTu—420,000
Geekbench 6 (single)—600Top 78%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—1,900Top 74%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup