Samsung Exynos 2400 vs Unisoc Tiger T820
51.7CPU27
49.4GPU—
71.2Benchmarks35.9
66.5Efficiency52.5
6 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 24001 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T820
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2400 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 57.9 to 35.6, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+35) and CPU (+25). Unisoc Tiger T820 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger CPU score: 52 vs 27
- Stronger benchmarks score: 71 vs 36
- Stronger efficiency score: 67 vs 53
- 307% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,914,857 vs 470,000
- 212% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,150 vs 690
Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T820
- 33% lower TDP (typical): 6 W vs 9 W
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2023 |
| Process | 4 nm+33% | 6 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | 6 W+33% |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 10+25% | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 | 1x2.7 GHz Cortex-A76 + 3x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.2 GHz+19% | 2.7 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 940 | Arm Mali-G57 MP4 |
AI
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Samsung NPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X-2133 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 17.1 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem | Integrated 5G (sub-6) |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Unisoc Tiger T820 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,914,857+307%Top 12% | 470,000Top 63% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,150+212%Top 16% | 690Top 75% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,600+193%Top 15% | 2,250Top 59% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,800Top 21% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | 637,914Top 26% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | 562,338Top 29% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | 289,405Top 40% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | 425,200Top 29% | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Apple A16 BionicVSUnisoc Tiger T820vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3VSUnisoc Tiger T820vs Huawei Kirin 9000SVSUnisoc Tiger T820vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050VSUnisoc Tiger T820vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2VS