Skip to content
InnoReviews

Unisoc Tiger T760 vs Unisoc T765

Unisoc Tiger T760
33.4Inno Score
VS
Unisoc T765
—Inno Score
22.8CPU24.5
—GPU55
33.1Benchmarks—
54.9Efficiencyspec-based36
0 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T7604 spec wins — Unisoc T765

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Unisoc T765 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T760

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T765

  • 23% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 736 vs 600

General

General comparison: Unisoc Tiger T760 versus Unisoc T765
SpecUnisoc Tiger T760Unisoc T765
Announced20222023
Process6 nm6 nm
TDP (typical)5 W—
ArchitectureArmv8.2Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Unisoc Tiger T760 versus Unisoc T765
SpecUnisoc Tiger T760Unisoc T765
Cores88
Core configuration4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A552x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.2 GHz2.3 GHz+5%

GPU

GPU comparison: Unisoc Tiger T760 versus Unisoc T765
SpecUnisoc Tiger T760Unisoc T765
GPUArm Mali-G57 MP4Arm Mali-G57 MC2
GPU clock—850 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Unisoc Tiger T760 versus Unisoc T765
SpecUnisoc Tiger T760Unisoc T765
Memory typeLPDDR4X-2133LPDDR4X-2133
Max bandwidth17.1 GB/s—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Unisoc Tiger T760 versus Unisoc T765
SpecUnisoc Tiger T760Unisoc T765
ModemIntegrated 5G (sub-6)Integrated 5G (SA/NSA), LTE Cat-15 (DL) / Cat-18 (UL)
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.25.0

Media

Media comparison: Unisoc Tiger T760 versus Unisoc T765
SpecUnisoc Tiger T760Unisoc T765
Max displayFHD+ @ 120HzFHD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture4K@30fps4K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Unisoc Tiger T760 versus Unisoc T765
SpecUnisoc Tiger T760Unisoc T765
AnTuTu420,000—
Geekbench 6 (single)600Bottom 23%736+23%Bottom 29%
Geekbench 6 (multi)1,900Bottom 24%1,925+1%Bottom 27%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup