Skip to content
InnoReviews

AGM PAD P3 Compact vs Ulefone RugKing Pad Pro

WINNER
AGM PAD P3 Compact
38.6Inno Score
VS
Ulefone RugKing Pad Pro
38.4Inno Score
32.7chipPerformancechip39.6
48.4Display44.2
24.1Battery23.1
52.5Portability52.5
44Features37.6
3 spec wins — AGM PAD P3 Compact3 spec wins — Ulefone RugKing Pad Pro

InnoReviews verdict

This one is close to a dead heat: AGM PAD P3 Compact scores 38.6 against 38.4 for Ulefone RugKing Pad Pro. Pick by the categories that matter to you — AGM PAD P3 Compact edges ahead in features and display, or by price.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the AGM PAD P3 Compact

  • Stronger display score: 48 vs 44
  • Stronger features score: 44 vs 38
  • 213% higher Rear camera: 50 MP vs 16 MP
  • 33% higher Refresh rate: 120 Hz vs 90 Hz

Reasons to pick the Ulefone RugKing Pad Pro

  • Stronger performance score: 40 vs 33
  • 43% higher Peak brightness: 860 nits vs 600 nits
  • 33% higher RAM: 8 GB vs 6 GB
  • 15% lower thickness: 12.4 mm vs 14.5 mm

Display

Display comparison: AGM PAD P3 Compact versus Ulefone RugKing Pad Pro
SpecAGM PAD P3 CompactUlefone RugKing Pad Pro
Screen size8.7 ″8.7 ″
Panel typeLCDIPS LCD
Resolution800 x 13401340x800
Pixel density180 ppi180 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz+33%90 Hz
Peak brightness600 nits860 nits+43%

Performance

Performance comparison: AGM PAD P3 Compact versus Ulefone RugKing Pad Pro
SpecAGM PAD P3 CompactUlefone RugKing Pad Pro
ChipsetMediaTek Helio G99Unisoc T7250
RAM6 GB8 GB+33%
Storage options128GB128GB

Battery

Battery comparison: AGM PAD P3 Compact versus Ulefone RugKing Pad Pro
SpecAGM PAD P3 CompactUlefone RugKing Pad Pro
Capacity7,200 mAh+1%7,100 mAh
Charging18 W18 W

Design

Design comparison: AGM PAD P3 Compact versus Ulefone RugKing Pad Pro
SpecAGM PAD P3 CompactUlefone RugKing Pad Pro
Weight540 g540 g
Thickness14.5 mm12.4 mm+15%
MaterialPolycarbonate + soft-touch rubber—

Camera

Camera comparison: AGM PAD P3 Compact versus Ulefone RugKing Pad Pro
SpecAGM PAD P3 CompactUlefone RugKing Pad Pro
Rear camera50 MP+213%16 MP
Front camera8 MP8 MP

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: AGM PAD P3 Compact versus Ulefone RugKing Pad Pro
SpecAGM PAD P3 CompactUlefone RugKing Pad Pro
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.25.2
Cellular4G LTE, eSIM4G LTE (dual nano SIM, eSIM)
USBUSB-CUSB-C 2.0

Features

Features comparison: AGM PAD P3 Compact versus Ulefone RugKing Pad Pro
SpecAGM PAD P3 CompactUlefone RugKing Pad Pro
SpeakersStereo (dual box speakers)—
Operating systemAndroid 16Android 16

Related comparisons

AGM PAD P3 Compactvs Honor Pad X9VSAGM PAD P3 Compactvs Huion Kamvas Pad 12VSAGM PAD P3 Compactvs POCO Pad C1VSAGM PAD P3 Compactvs Galaxy Tab Active3VSUlefone RugKing Pad Provs iPad mini (A12)VSUlefone RugKing Pad Provs OPPO Pad NeoVSUlefone RugKing Pad Provs Oscal Pad 13VSUlefone RugKing Pad Provs OUKITEL RT11VS

Try another matchup