Apple A17 Pro vs Samsung Exynos 2600
62.5CPU72.6
48.9GPU77.4
62.2Benchmarks81.1
72AIspec-based—
79.6Efficiencyspec-based100
0 spec wins — Apple A17 Pro11 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2600
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2600 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 80.4 to 62.6, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+29) and benchmarks (+19). Apple A17 Pro still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A17 Pro
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600
- Stronger CPU score: 73 vs 63
- Stronger GPU score: 77 vs 49
- Stronger benchmarks score: 81 vs 62
- 196% higher AnTuTu 11 (CPU): 947,776 vs 320,136
- 136% higher AnTuTu 11 (GPU): 1,052,625 vs 446,750
General
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2026 |
| Process | 3 nm | 2 nm+33% |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv8.6 | Armv9.3 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 10+67% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.78 GHz + 4x2.11 GHz | 1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency) |
| Max clock | 3.78 GHz | — |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (6-core) | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 35 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | — |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X70) | — |
Media
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 11 | 1,334,021Top 42% | 2,827,538+112%Top 8% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 320,136Bottom 42% | 947,776+196%Top 5% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 446,750Top 35% | 1,052,625+136%Top 8% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 169,688Bottom 43% | 347,409+105%Top 15% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 397,447Top 37% | 479,728+21%Top 24% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,926Top 8% | 2,995+2%Top 7% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,237Top 12% | 10,824+50%Top 4% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,746Top 18% | 7,230+93%Top 5% |
Related comparisons
Apple A17 Provs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VSApple A17 Provs MediaTek Dimensity 9300+VSApple A17 Provs MediaTek Dimensity 9300VSApple A17 Provs MediaTek Dimensity 9400eVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Xiaomi Xring O3VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteVS

