Google Tensor G5 vs Samsung Exynos 2600
55CPU72.6
45.7GPU77.4
60.5Benchmarks81.1
82.1Efficiencyspec-based100
0 spec wins — Google Tensor G56 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2600
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2600 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 80.4 to 58.2, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+32) and benchmarks (+21). Google Tensor G5 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G5
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600
- Stronger CPU score: 73 vs 55
- Stronger GPU score: 77 vs 46
- Stronger benchmarks score: 81 vs 61
- 116% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 7,230 vs 3,350
- 75% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,824 vs 6,200
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2026 |
| Process | 3 nm | 2 nm+33% |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv9.3 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x3.78 GHz Cortex-X4 + 5x3.05 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A520 | 1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency) |
| Max clock | 3.78 GHz | — |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Imagination PowerVR DXT-48-1536 | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (MediaTek T900) | — |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 1,250,000 | 2,827,538Top 12% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 947,776Top 9% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 1,052,625Top 12% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 347,409Top 23% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 479,728Top 25% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,300Top 14% | 2,995+30%Top 9% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,200Top 20% | 10,824+75%Top 5% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,350Top 37% | 7,230+116%Top 7% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G5vs Samsung Exynos 2400VSGoogle Tensor G5vs MediaTek Dimensity 8500VSGoogle Tensor G5vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSGoogle Tensor G5vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5VS

