Huawei Kirin 9020 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
36.1CPU57.2
36.8GPU54.3
—Benchmarks74.2
—AIspec-based85.9
20Efficiencyspec-based79.6
0 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 90207 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2500 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66.1 to 32.9, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+21) and GPU (+18). Huawei Kirin 9020 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 9020
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 36
- Stronger GPU score: 54 vs 37
- 131% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 4,400 vs 1,907
- 82% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 8,200 vs 4,505
- 79% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,300 vs 1,285
General
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9020 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2025 |
| Process | 7 nm | 3 nm+57% |
| TDP (typical) | — | 8 W |
| Architecture | ARM (in-house HiSilicon cores) | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9020 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x2.5 GHz HiSilicon Big + 3x2.15 GHz HiSilicon Mid + 4x1.6 GHz HiSilicon Little | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.3 GHz+32% |
GPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9020 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | HiSilicon Maleoon 920 | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
| GPU clock | 840 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9020 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 59 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9020 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | — | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9020 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | — | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9020 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | — | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9020 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | — | 2,150,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,285Top 40% | 2,300+79%Top 14% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,505Top 29% | 8,200+82%Top 11% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,907Bottom 48% | 4,400+131%Top 19% |
Related comparisons
Huawei Kirin 9020vs MediaTek Dimensity 7100VSHuawei Kirin 9020vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100+VSHuawei Kirin 9020vs Unisoc Tiger T760VSHuawei Kirin 9020vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Google Tensor G6VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400eVS
