MediaTek Dimensity 8300 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
41.5CPU57.2
38GPU54.3
65.5Benchmarks74.2
—AI85.9
73.8Efficiency79.6
2 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 83007 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2500 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66.1 to 51.2, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+16) and CPU (+16). MediaTek Dimensity 8300 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 8300
- 25% lower TDP (typical): 6 W vs 8 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 42
- Stronger GPU score: 54 vs 38
- Stronger benchmarks score: 74 vs 66
- Stronger efficiency score: 80 vs 74
- 83% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 4,400 vs 2,400
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2025 |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm+25% |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W+25% | 8 W |
| Architecture | Armv9 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 + 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A715 + 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A510 | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.35 GHz+2% | 3.3 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G615 MC6 | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek APU 780 | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 59 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X-8533 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 68.3 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | 5.2 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,524,125Top 19% | 2,150,000+41%Top 8% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,400Top 32% | 2,300+64%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,500Top 26% | 8,200+82%Top 9% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,400Top 47% | 4,400+83%Top 17% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | 439,015Top 46% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | 422,306Top 40% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | 298,333Top 38% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | 364,471Top 43% | — |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 8300vs Apple A15 BionicVSMediaTek Dimensity 8300vs Google Tensor G4VSMediaTek Dimensity 8300vs MediaTek Dimensity 8350VSMediaTek Dimensity 8300vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A17 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VS

