MediaTek Dimensity 8300 vs Samsung Exynos 2600
41.5CPU72.6
38GPU77.4
65.5Benchmarks81.1
73.8Efficiencyspec-based100
0 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 830011 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2600
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2600 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 80.4 to 51.2, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+39) and CPU (+31). MediaTek Dimensity 8300 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 8300
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600
- Stronger CPU score: 73 vs 42
- Stronger GPU score: 77 vs 38
- Stronger benchmarks score: 81 vs 66
- 201% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 7,230 vs 2,400
- 149% higher AnTuTu 11 (GPU): 1,052,625 vs 422,306
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2026 |
| Process | 4 nm | 2 nm+50% |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv9 | Armv9.3 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 + 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A715 + 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A510 | 1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency) |
| Max clock | 3.35 GHz | — |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G615 MC6 | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek APU 780 | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X-8533 | — |
| Max bandwidth | 68.3 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem | — |
| Max download | 5.2 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 11 | 1,524,125Top 46% | 2,827,538+86%Top 14% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 439,015Bottom 52% | 947,776+116%Top 9% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 422,306Top 46% | 1,052,625+149%Top 14% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 298,333Top 44% | 347,409+16%Top 25% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 364,471Top 49% | 479,728+32%Top 28% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,400Top 35% | 2,995+114%Top 10% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,500Top 30% | 10,824+141%Top 6% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,400Top 49% | 7,230+201%Top 8% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 8300vs Apple A15 BionicVSMediaTek Dimensity 8300vs Google Tensor G4VSMediaTek Dimensity 8300vs MediaTek Dimensity 8350VSMediaTek Dimensity 8300vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5VS

