MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ vs Samsung Exynos 2600
55.9CPU72.6
56.3GPU77.4
73.5Benchmarks81.1
66.5Efficiencyspec-based100
1 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 9300+10 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2600
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2600 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 80.4 to 61.7, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+21) and CPU (+17). MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600
- Stronger CPU score: 73 vs 56
- Stronger GPU score: 77 vs 56
- Stronger benchmarks score: 81 vs 74
- 70% higher AnTuTu 11 (GPU): 1,052,625 vs 620,215
- 55% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 7,230 vs 4,650
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2026 |
| Process | 4 nm | 2 nm+50% |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv9.3 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 + 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720 | 1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency) |
| Max clock | 3.4 GHz | — |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek APU 790 | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5T-9600 | — |
| Max bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem | — |
| Max download | 7 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | WQHD+ @ 180Hz | — |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 11 | 2,092,277Top 28% | 2,827,538+35%Top 12% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 643,013Top 28% | 947,776+47%Top 9% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 620,215Top 31% | 1,052,625+70%Top 12% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 352,226+1%Top 20% | 347,409Top 23% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 476,823Top 28% | 479,728+1%Top 25% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,250Top 15% | 2,995+33%Top 9% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,600Top 12% | 10,824+42%Top 4% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 4,650Top 16% | 7,230+55%Top 7% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VSMediaTek Dimensity 9300+vs Apple A17 ProVSMediaTek Dimensity 9300+vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300VSMediaTek Dimensity 9300+vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5VS

