MediaTek Dimensity 9400e vs Samsung Exynos 2600
55.7CPU72.6
61.6GPU77.4
77.1Benchmarks81.1
68Efficiencyspec-based100
1 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 9400e10 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2600
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2600 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 80.4 to 64.1, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+17) and GPU (+16). MediaTek Dimensity 9400e still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 9400e
- 16% higher AnTuTu 11 (UX): 557,547 vs 479,728
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600
- Stronger CPU score: 73 vs 56
- Stronger GPU score: 77 vs 62
- Stronger benchmarks score: 81 vs 77
- 50% lower process: 2 nm vs 4 nm
- 46% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,824 vs 7,439
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400e | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2026 |
| Process | 4 nm | 2 nm+50% |
| Architecture | Armv9.2-A | Armv9.3 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400e | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 + 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720 | 1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency) |
| Max clock | 3.4 GHz | — |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400e | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400e | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek NPU 790 | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400e | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X / LPDDR5T-9600 | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400e | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem (3GPP R16) | — |
| Max download | 7 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400e | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | 4K @ 120Hz / WQHD @ 180Hz | — |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400e | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 11 | 2,415,876Top 24% | 2,827,538+17%Top 13% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 726,809Top 24% | 947,776+30%Top 8% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 795,971Top 26% | 1,052,625+32%Top 13% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 335,549Top 31% | 347,409+4%Top 24% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 557,547+16%Top 21% | 479,728Top 29% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,265Top 16% | 2,995+32%Top 9% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,439Top 14% | 10,824+46%Top 5% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 5,300Top 13% | 7,230+36%Top 7% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 9400evs Apple A17 ProVSMediaTek Dimensity 9400evs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VSMediaTek Dimensity 9400evs Google Tensor G6VSMediaTek Dimensity 9400evs Samsung Exynos 2500VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5VS

