Skip to content
InnoReviews

Unisoc T765 vs Unisoc Tiger T820

Unisoc T765
—Inno Score
VS
Unisoc Tiger T820
35.6Inno Score
24.5CPU27
55GPU—
—Benchmarks35.9
36Efficiencyspec-based52.5
1 spec wins — Unisoc T7652 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T820

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Unisoc T765 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T765

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T820

  • 17% higher Max clock: 2.7 GHz vs 2.3 GHz
  • 17% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 2,250 vs 1,925

General

General comparison: Unisoc T765 versus Unisoc Tiger T820
SpecUnisoc T765Unisoc Tiger T820
Announced20232023
Process6 nm6 nm
TDP (typical)—6 W
ArchitectureArmv8.2Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Unisoc T765 versus Unisoc Tiger T820
SpecUnisoc T765Unisoc Tiger T820
Cores88
Core configuration2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A551x2.7 GHz Cortex-A76 + 3x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.3 GHz2.7 GHz+17%

GPU

GPU comparison: Unisoc T765 versus Unisoc Tiger T820
SpecUnisoc T765Unisoc Tiger T820
GPUArm Mali-G57 MC2Arm Mali-G57 MP4
GPU clock850 MHz—

Memory

Memory comparison: Unisoc T765 versus Unisoc Tiger T820
SpecUnisoc T765Unisoc Tiger T820
Memory typeLPDDR4X-2133LPDDR4X-2133
Max bandwidth—17.1 GB/s

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Unisoc T765 versus Unisoc Tiger T820
SpecUnisoc T765Unisoc Tiger T820
ModemIntegrated 5G (SA/NSA), LTE Cat-15 (DL) / Cat-18 (UL)Integrated 5G (sub-6)
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.05.2

Media

Media comparison: Unisoc T765 versus Unisoc Tiger T820
SpecUnisoc T765Unisoc Tiger T820
Max displayFHD+ @ 120HzFHD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture4K@30fps4K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Unisoc T765 versus Unisoc Tiger T820
SpecUnisoc T765Unisoc Tiger T820
AnTuTu—470,000
Geekbench 6 (single)736+7%Bottom 29%690Bottom 23%
Geekbench 6 (multi)1,925Bottom 27%2,250+17%Bottom 40%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup